Murugesan v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 Murugesan ... Petitioner versus

1. The District Collector, Trichy District, Collectorate, Trichy.

2. The Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Panchayat Union Office, Thottiyam, Trichy District.

3. The President, Kaduvetti Panchayat, Thottiyam, Trichy District.

4. The Secretary, Kaduvetti Panchayat, Thottiyam Union, Trichy District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records 1/4

pertaining to Na.Ka.A1/2474/2014 dated 03.12.2014 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal. For Petitioner : No appearance For R1, R3 and : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh R4 Additional Govt. Pleader For R2 : Mr.M.Rajarajan

ORDER

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 10.03.2023 and 21.03.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 31.03.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

2/4

To

1. The District Collector, Trichy District, Collectorate, Trichy.

2. The Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Panchayat Union Office, Thottiyam, Trichy District.

3. The President, Kaduvetti Panchayat, Thottiyam, Trichy District.

4. The Secretary, Kaduvetti Panchayat, Thottiyam Union, Trichy District.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 31.03.2023 4/4