← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/10796/2015disposed of

M/S. Suganya Constructions, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2025-04-07Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji8 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 07.04.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI WP(MD). No.10796 & 16863 of 2015 and 9067, 9068 & 20218 of 2016 and WMP(MD) No.1, 1 of 2015 and 7203, 7204 & 14494 of 2016 WP(MD). No.10796 of 2015:- M/s.Suganya Constructions, Rep. by its Managing Director, Mr.R.Malaiyarasan, Having registered Office at 1-1-11, Malaiyarasan Cottage, Velmurugan Colony, Aruppukottai,

...Petitioner

Rep. by the Secretary, 1/8

... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Declaration, to declare the provisions of the Tamilnadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into local areas Act, 1990, as unconstitutional, ultra vires Articles 14, 19 (1), 19 (g) 301 and 304 (a) and (b) of the constitution of India and being unenforceable and of no effect in so far as the petitioner is concerned. : Mr.V.Veerapandian For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar WP(MD). No.16863 of 2015:- Tvl.Virumandi Construction, Rep. by its Partner, V.Virumandi, No.3-A, Thiruvalluvar Street, Thirunagar, Madurai - 625 006.

... Petitioner Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes & Registration Department,

2. The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Thirupparamkundram Assessment Circle, Madurai - 20.

2/8

Madurai (South).

... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990, as ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 301 and 304 (a) and (b) of the Constitution of India and being non-compensatory in nature in view of the recent finding rendered by the First Bench of the Honourable High Court in the case of MR.R.Gandhi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in 13 VST 390 following the law declared by the Supreme Court of India in the judgment reported in 145 STC 544 and therefore unenforceable and of no effect insofar as the petitioner herein is concerned. : Mr.A.Chandrasekaran For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar WP(MD). No.9067 & 9068 of 2016:- M/s.Suganya Constructions, Rep. by its Managing Director, Mr.R.Malaiyarasan, Having registered Office at Malaiyarasan Cottage, Old Door No.1-18/11C, New Door No.1-1-11, Velmurugan Colony, Aruppukottai - 626 601,

...Petitioner in both petitions

Rep. by the Secretary, 3/8

... Respondents in both petitions COMMON PRAYER :- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Declaration, to declare the provisions of the Tamilnadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into local areas Act, 1990, as unconstitutional, ultra vires Articles 14, 19 (1), 19 (g) 301 and 304 (a) and (b) of the constitution of India and being unenforceable and of no effect in so far as the petitioner is concerned. : Mr.V.Veerapandian (in both WPs) For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar (in both WPs) WP(MD). No.20218 of 2016:- S.K.Subba Reddiar, 121-178H, Thiruchuli Road, Aruppukottai - 626 101, ... Petitioner Rep. by the Secretary, 4/8

... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Declaration, to declare the provisions of the Tamilnadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into local areas Act, 1990, as unconstitutional, ultra vires Articles 14, 19 (1), 19 (g) 301 and 304 (a) and (b) of the constitution of India and being unenforceable and of no effect in so far as the petitioner is concerned. : Mr.V.Veerapandian For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice) Counsel for petitioners state that, in view of the finding of this Court in the case of V.Krishnamurthy v. State of Tamil Nadu and others1, the present petitions may be dismissed.

2. It will be apposite to reproduce Paragraph 67 of the said judgment as under :

''67. Thus, in our considered view, the judgment in the case of (Order dated 29.1.2019 passed in W.P.No.32710 of 2005 etc.) 5/8

Fr.William Fernandez (2018) 57 GSTR 6 (SC) applies with full force to the cases on hand which arise under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Act which is pari materia to the Kerala enactment, which was considered by the honourable Supreme Court and levy of entry tax on imported vehicles was upheld. Thus, we are of the clear view that the prayer sought for by the writ petitioners in these cases are not tenable and the writ petitions are liable to be dismissed.''

3. Writ Petitions stand dismissed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interim applications stand closed. (K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.) (P.B.BALAJI, J.) 07.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Sm 6/8

TO:-

1. The Secretary,

3. The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Thirupparamkundram Assessment Circle, Madurai - 20.

4. The Regional Transport Officer,

5. The Regional Transport Officer, Madurai (South).

7/8

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.B.BALAJI, J.

Sm COMMON ORDER IN WP(MD) No.10796 & 16863 of 2015 and 9067, 9068 & 20218 of 2016 Date: 07.04.2025 8/8