Vinothini Muthusamy v. Vivek Rao
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Vinothini Muthusamy ... Petitioner/ 4th Respondent/ Defacto Complainant Vs.
1.Vivek Rao ... 1st Respondent/ Petitioner/ Accused 2.The Superintendent of Police, 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, ... Respondents 2 & 3/ Respondents 1 & 2 4.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, ... 4th Respondent/ 3rd Respondent/ Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in pertaining to the order made in C.R.M.P.No.1895 of 2021 in C.C.No.26 of 2021 dated 05.10.2021, by the Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai, Trichy District. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj For Respondents : Mr.M.Veeranthiran Government Advocate (Crl.Side) R.2 to R.4 Mr.B.Prahalad Ravi for R.1 1/3
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 2 to 4 and the learned counsel appearing for the private respondents.
2. The petitioner is the defacto complainant in C.C.No.26 of 2021 registered on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai. The petitioner is aggrieved by the grant of permission in favour of the accused to leave India. The petitioner's counsel states that the petitioner was not put on notice. This is controverted by the learned counsel appearing for the accused contending that the petitioner has given a power of attorney in favour of her father and he was duly intimated by the police and only thereafter the orders were passed.
3. Be that as it may, the order impugned in the Criminal Original Petition is fairly well reasoned and it shows application of mind. No interference is called for. This Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-I) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) mga Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, 2.The Superintendent of Police, 2/3
3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, 4.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
21.01.2022 RK(07/02/2022) 3P 6C 3/3