← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/2130/2014dismissed

K.Thirugnanam, v. The Director General Of

2021-11-22Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan2 pages

W.P.(MD).No.2130 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.11.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD).No.2130 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).No.2 of 2014 1.K.Thirugnanam 2.T.Senthilkumar ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The Director General of Police Office of the Director General of Police, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, New Natham Road, Madurai City.

4.P.Sheik Ayuub ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from proceeding with any enquiry against the petitioners in relation to the property situated in T.S.No.1591/10, Re-survey No.79, Door No.9/35, Madurai Town, Survey Ward No.5, Corporation Ward No.16, measuring 480 sq.ft which includes house and shop in the guise of conducting enquiry without resorting to due process of law.

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Murugesan For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.D.Ghandiraj, Special Government Pleader For R-4 : Mrs.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya

ORDER

Heard Mr.N.Murugesan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.D.Ghandiraj, learned Special Government Pleader who appears on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and Mrs.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya, learned counsel for the fourth respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD).No.2130 of 2014

2. Let me not enter into a detailed discussion on the averments made in the Writ Petition raising allegations as against the fourth respondent, since the learned Special Government Pleader had forwarded a communication from the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Madurai City dated 28.08.2013, in which, it had been stated that though the disputed property, was on that date an undivided property, both the parties namely the petitioners herein and the fourth respondent had accepted to measure the disputed property through the Corporation Surveyor/Taluk Surveyor, Madurai and to settle their issues.

3. I am also informed that the matter has ended amicably. Nothing further survives for adjudication. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (W) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Nsr/Lm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Director General of Police Office of the Director General of Police, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, New Natham Road, Madurai City.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-35468[F] dated 23/11/2021 ) W.P.(MD).No.2130 of 2014 22.11.2021 PS(CO) GC(04.12.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2