Nirmala, W/O. Arulsamy, v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.(MD)No.21578 of 2018 Nirmala ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pavurchathiram Police Station, Pavurchathiram, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 24.09.2018 within a time frame as fixed by this Court besides directing them to give adequate police protection for the life and limb of the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prahalad Ravi For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 24.09.2018 and to give adequate police protection.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that she is the Managing Trustee of the Leo Village Education Development Charitable Trust. The said Trust is running a School viz., St.Azeze Matriculation School at Pavurchathiram and one Antony Xevier, who was the Managing Trustee of the above said Trust, relieved from the trusteeship and creating a problem. Hence, the petitioner made a representation to the second respondent police to give protection to her. Since the said representation has not been considered, the present writ petition has been filed.

3. Today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions would submit that already the petitioner's representation has been considered by the second respondent police and after enquiry, it was closed.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Considering the fact that already the petitioner's representation dated 24.09.2018, has been considered and closed by the second respondent police, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. However, if at all the petitioner has any grievance over the same, it is always open to her to challenge the same. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pavurchathiram Police Station, Pavurchathiram, Tirunelveli District.

+1 CC to M/s.B.PRAHALAD RAVI, Advocate ( SR-76720[F] dated 22/07/2019 ) W.P.(MD)No.21578 of 2018 18.07.2019 AKV MK (06.08.2019) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/