← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/3087/2014dismissed

G. Sugapriyan, v. The District Collector,

2019-08-01Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.08.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P[MD]No.3087 of 2014 and M.P.[MD]Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 G.Sugapriyan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The District Employment Exchange Officer, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

3.The Tahsildar, 4.Selvi 5.The Revenue Inspector, Kadalaiyur Firka, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the third respondent from appointing any person to the post of Village Assistant at Chidambarapuram Village, Ettayapuram Taluk, Thoothukudi District and consequently direct the second respondent to sponsor fresh list of candidates to the third respondent to fill up the post of Village Assistant at Chidambarapuram Village, Ettayapuram Taluk, Thoothukudi District by including the petitioner's name within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents 1 to 3, 5 : Mr.K.Mu.Muthu Additional Government Pleader For Respondent No.4 : No appearance 1/3

O R D E R

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to forbear the third respondent from appointing any person to the post of Village Assistant at Chidambarapuram Village, Ettayapuram Taluk, Thoothukudi District and consequently to direct the second respondent to sponsor fresh list of candidates to the third respondent to fill up the post of Village Assistant at Chidambarapuram Village, Ettayapuram Taluk, Thoothukudi District by including the name of the writ petitioner.

2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the official respondents states that one Karuppuswamy was selected as Village Assistant at Chidambarapuram Village, Ettayapuram Taluk, Thoothukudi District, during the relevant point of time in the year 2014 and he is working for the past 5 years. 3.Thus, the relief as such sought for to forbear the third respondent cannot be granted at this length of time. This apart, the writ petitioner had not participated in the process of selection. Therefore, no further adjudication is required. 4.Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The District Employment Exchange Officer, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

3.The Tahsildar, 2/3

4.The Revenue Inspector, Kadalaiyur Firka, +1 CC to M/s.G.THALAIMUTHARASU, Advocate ( SR-79323[F] dated 02/08/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-79484[F] dated 02/08/2019 ) W.P[MD]No.3087 of 2014 01.08.2019 MR JMN(20.08.2019) 3P : 7C 3/3