← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/3551/2014dismissed

T.Shanmugam, v. Tamil Nadu Generation

2022-12-20Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.12.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY T. Shanmugam ...

Petitioner Vs.

1. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Represented by its Chairman, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The Chief Engineer/Personnel, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Administrative Branch, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

...

Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned selection list of Technical Assistant Post (EEE) by Direct Recruitment for the year 2013-14 dated 24.02.2014 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same in so far as non- selection of the petitioner in the post of Technical Assistant (EEE) in scheduled caste (priority category) and consequently 1/4

direct the respondents to include the petitioner's name in the Selection Panel List for the year 2013-14 .

For Petitioner : M/s.B.Prasanna Vinoth For Respondents : M/s.M.Rajeswari, for M/s.M.Parameswari, Standing Counsel

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to quash the impugned selection list of Technical Assistant Post (EEE) by Direct Recruitment for the year 2013-14 dated 24.02.2014 issued by the 1st respondent in so far as non-selection of the petitioner for the post of Technical Assistant (EEE) in Scheduled Caste (priority category) and sought consequential direction to the respondents to include the petitioner's name in the Selection Panel List for the year 2013-14 .

2. Heard M/s.B.Prasanna Vinoth, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and M/s.M.Rajeswari, for M/s.M.Parameswari, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. Perused the material documents available on record.

2/4

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted 'No Instructions'.

4. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition and also the Recruitment is for the year 2013-2014.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No Costs. Index : Yes / No 20.12.2022 Internet : Yes ksa 3/4

S.SRIMATHY, J ksa Order made in 20.12.2022 4/4