I.Anthony, v. The Canteen Management

W.P.(MD) No.13616 of 2018 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.01.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.(MD) No.13616 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.12397 & 12398 of 2018 I.Anthony .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Canteen Management Committee, Rep. by its General Officer, Commanding Head Quarters, Dakshin Bharath Area, Island Ground, Chennai - 09.

2.The General Officer, Commanding Head Quarters, Dakshin Bharath Area, Island Ground, Chennai - 09.

3.The Chairman, Golden Palm Canteen, Dakshin Bharath Area, Island Ground, Chennai - 09.

4.The Executive Director (VW), Golden Palm Canteen, V.W.No.2, Military Lane Road, DSSA Board Complex, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli - 02.

5.The Assistant Executive Director, Golden Palm Canteen, No.2, Military Lane Road, DSSA Board Complex, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli - 02.

6.The Executive Director, Golden Palm Canteen, VIT Post, Vellore, Vellore District.

.. Respondents PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of declaration, declaring that the rule which is referred and relied upon in the impugned order of transfer passed by the 3rd respondent in EX NK/I. Antony Security dated 14.06.2018 under the caption Transfer Notice that incase of non compliance with the transfer order the transferee should join in the transferred place or resign from the job or the authorities have got https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD) No.13616 of 2018 the right to terminate the service is ultra vires of the Constitution of India and consequently call for the records from the 3rd respondent relating to the impugned order of transfer passed by him in his proceedings in EX.NK/I.Antony Security dated 14.06.2018 under the caption Transfer Notice by 3rd respondent, quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Senthur Pandian For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbiah Central Government Standing Counsel

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr.P.Senthur Pandian, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the same issue has been filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.

2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

W.P.(MD) No.13616 of 2018 18.01.2021 PU(CO) KB(01.02.2021) 2P 1C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2