← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/19506/2023disposed of

M/S. Uvaraj Industries v. The State Tax Officer

2024-06-26Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan8 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.06.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.16135, 16137 & 16139 of 2023 M/s.Uvaraj Industries, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr.D.Vetriselvan, SF 41/4, 49/1, Kandhalur, Trichy - 620 025.

... Petitioner in all W.Ps.

Vs.

The State Tax Officer, Ponmalai Assessment Circle, Office of the State Tax Officer, Trichy - 620 020.

... Respondent in all W.Ps.

Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the impugned Notices bearing Pa.Sa.No.33AACFU2202N1ZE/2017-2018 dated 24.07.2023, Pa.Sa.No.33AACFU2202N1ZE/2019-2020 dated 24.07.2023 and Pa.Sa.No.33AACFU2202N1ZE/2018-2019 dated 24.07.2023 passed by the respondent and quashing the same. Page No. 1 of 8

For Petitioner in all W.Ps.

: Mr.P.Thangaraju For Respondent in all W.Ps.

: Mr.R.Sureshkumar Additional Government Pleader ***** C O M M O N O R D E R By this common order, all these 3 Writ Petitions are being disposed of.

2. In these Writ Petitions, the petitioner has challenged the following impugned recovery Notices dated 24.07.2023 issued by the respondent:- Sl.

No W.P.(MD) No.

Ref. No. of the impugned Notice Assessment Year 19506/2023 Pa.Sa.No.33AACFU2202N1ZE/2017-2018 2017-2018 19507/2023 Pa.Sa.No.33AACFU2202N1ZE/2019-2020 2019-2020 19508/2023 Pa.Sa.No.33AACFU2202N1ZE/2018-2019 2018-2019

3. It appears that the petitioner had suffered the following adverse Orders-in-Original in the hands of the Original Authority:- Page No. 2 of 8

Sl.

No W.P.(MD) No.

Reference No. of the Order-in-Original Date of the order Assessment Year 19506/2023 ZA3310210059276 20.10.2021 2017-2018 19507/2023 ZD331221003459V 20.12.2021 2019-2020 19508/2023 ZD3310210023659 22.10.2021 2018-2019

4. Against the above said orders, the petitioner preferred appeals before the Appellate Authority which were dismissed vide the following orders:- Sl.

No W.P.(MD) No.

Reference No. of the Order-in-Appeal Date of the Order-in-Appeal Assessment Year 19506/2023 AP/GST/149/2022 05.07.2023 2017-2018 19507/2023 AP/GST/148/2022 05.07.2023 2019-2020 19508/2023 AP/GST/150/2022 05.07.2023 2018-2019

5. Consequently, the impugned recovery Notices were issued by the respondent seeking to recover the amount confirmed vide Orders-inOriginal as affirmed by the Orders-in-Appeal of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST), Trichy. Challenging the same, the petitioner is before this Court as no GST Tribunal has been constituted. Though the GST Tribunal has recently been notified, it is yet to come into force. Page No. 3 of 8

6. The petitioner would have been required to deposit 20% under Section 112 of the GST Act over and above the amount that was paid by the petitioner at the stage of appeal before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 107 of the GST Act.

7. According to the petitioner, the petitioner has deposited more than 20% of the disputed tax as is contemplated under Section 112 of the TNGST Act, 2017.

8. The learned counsel for the petitioner would place reliance on the decision of the Bombay High Court in Rochem India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Union of India and others, [2023] 111 GSTR 218 (Bom.) : 2023 [73] G.S.T.L. 528, wherein, the Court has held as under:- "10. The Chairman of the Board, in the affidavit, has indicated that no hardship would be caused to the taxpayers because of the nonconstitution of the Tribunal. Reading the affidavit along with Circular, it is clear that the Government does not intend that taxpayers are prejudiced for want of the Tribunal. With that intent, the period of limitation has been extended. As a corollary of the intention expressed in the affidavit and the Circular, it follows that the appealable orders (to the Tribunal) would not be implemented till the Tribunal becomes functional. That being the Page No. 4 of 8

position, the writ petitions do not need to remain pending in this Court. Some time after the tribunal becomes functional as above can be given.

11. It would be advisable, to avoid further complications, that the Respondent-Board issues instructions to incorporate Clause 4.2 of the Circular dated 18 March 2020 in each order which is appealable to the Appellate Tribunal constituted under Section 109 of the Act. This would guide the aggrieved parties as to the future course of conduct and reduce needless litigation in the form of filing writ petitions such as the present ones. The Learned ASG states that this option would be considered.

12. Therefore, we dispose of the Petitions as follows.

a) The period of filing the Appeal will stand extended as indicated in Clause 4.2 of the Circular dated 18 March 2020.

b) The impugned order will not be given effect until two weeks after the period prescribed for filing an appeal as under Clause 4.2 of the Circular dated 18 March 2020 is over.

13. All contentions of the parties are kept open, including a challenge to the validity of the provisions, if any."

9. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent.

Page No. 5 of 8

10. Considering the fact that the petitioner has deposited more than 20% of the disputed tax, the impugned recovery Notices issued to the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance subject to the condition that the petitioner either files appeals before the GST Tribunal in case GST Tribunal is constituted, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order or in the alternative, the petitioner files Writ Petitions challenging the respective Orders-in-Appeals and/or Orders-inOriginal, within such time.

11. In which case, the impugned Notice seeking to recover the amount shall stand stayed pending further orders in the Appeals before the GST Tribunal or in the Writ Petitions, as the case may be.

12. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 26.06.2024 Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order SMN2 / JEN Page No. 6 of 8

Copy To:

The State Tax Officer, Ponmalai Assessment Circle, Office of the State Tax Officer, Trichy - 620 020.

Page No. 7 of 8

C.SARAVANAN , J.

JEN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.16135, 16137 & 16139 of 2023 26.06.2024 Page No. 8 of 8