Thanalakshmi v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Thanalakshmi ... Petitioner versus

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Vathalagundu Police Station, Vathalagundu, Dindigul.

3. Soundarajan

4. Vimala ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to take necessary action based on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.07.2025 within the period stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manikandan For R1 and R2 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has lodged a complaint dated 08.07.2025 and also filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to take necessary action based on her complaint dated 08.07.2025.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner's complaint was registered in CSR No.662 of 2025 dated 15.07.2025 and the same was closed on 16.07.2025.

3. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this writ petition is closed with a direction to the respondent Police to furnish a copy of the closure report to the petitioner to workout her remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. 05.08.2025 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

2/4

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Vathalagundu Police Station, Vathalagundu, Dindigul.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 05.08.2025 4/4