← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12089/2018dismissed as infructuous

S.Muthu v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2024-03-12Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 12.03.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI WP(MD)No.12089 of 2018 and WMP(MD)No.11010 and 11011 of 2018 S.Muthu ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu by its Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort.St.George, Chennai.

2.The State of Tmail Nadu by its Director of Matriculation Schools, Office of the Director of Matriculation Schools, College Road, Chennai.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Thallakulam, Madurai.

4.The Inspector of Matriculation Schools, Office of the Inspector of Matriculation Schools, Thallakulam, Madurai.

5.The Correspondent, TVS Matriculation Higher Secondary Shool, Shift 1 and 2, TVS Nagar, Madurai - 3.

1/5

6.The Correspondent, Sri Aurobindo Mira Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Nehru Nagar, Madurai - 10.

7.The Correspondent, Ruby Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Palanganatham, Madurai.

8.The Correspondent, Sivakasi Nadar Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Madurai -10.

9.The Correspondent, SDA Matriculation School, Kennet Cross Road, Mahaboopalayam, Madurai - 10.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to take necessary action to give admission to the petitioner's daughter M.Tamilmani aged 3 years and 9 months in entry level class in anyone of the respondent Nos.5 to 9 school under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009 within the time stipulated by this Court.

2/5

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Senthilnathan For Respondent : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Nos.1 to 4 Additional Govt.Pleader For Respondent : Mr.M.Pandiyarajan No.5 For Respondent : Mr.I.Irulappan No.6 For Respondent : Mr.J.Barathan Nos.7 to 9

ORDER

When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

12.03.2024 Internet : Yes / No DSK 3/5

To 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Tahsildar, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.

5.The Inspector of Police, Aravayal Police Station, Sivagangai District.

4/5

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

dsk 12.03.2024 5/5