Gunasekaran v. The Superintending Engineer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.12.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.11072 and 11073 of 2018 Gunasekaran ... Petitioner versus The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department (Building) Construction and Maintenance Circle, Trichy.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent Tender Notice No. 46/2017-2018/SE/B(C&M) dated 20.03.2018 with specific reference to serial No.6 and quash the same and further direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to continue the contract work as per the agreement dated 16.10.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sekar 1/4

For Respondent : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infrcutuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

06.12.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

2/4

To The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department (Building) Construction and Maintenance Circle, Trichy.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 06.12.2023 4/4