Sundarapandi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 03/11/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN

1. Sundarapandi

2. Navina ... Petitioners/Accused No.3& 4 Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Dhadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District.

in Crime No.224 of 2022.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s. Jeyamohan K, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr No.224/2022 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused No.3& 4, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.07.2022 for the offences punishable under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(II)(C) and Section 25 of NDPS Act, 1985, in Crime No.224 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 28.07.2022, at about 01.00 p.m, on secret information, the respondent police went to the place of occurrence. On seeing the police party, the A1 to A4 tried to run away from the place of occurrence. But, the respondent police nabbed the accused and they were found in possession of 34 Kg of Ganja. Hence, the present case has been registered against the petitioners.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the first petitioner/A3 is the brother of A1. He is working in a private IT Company at Chennai. He is an Income Tax Assessee and his annual income is more than Rs.4 1/3

lakhs. To that effect, he enclosed the papers with the additional typed set of papers. The first petitioner is being brother of A1 and the second petitioner is being wife of A1, they were falsely implicated in this case. The second petitioner is only aged about 22 years and having 2 children. No previous case is pending against the petitioners. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that A1 used to purchase contraband along with A6 through A8. That contraband was transported through train from Andhra Pradesh to Dindigul Railway Station by A15 & A20. From there, with the help of A16 to A19, on the instruction of A1 to A6, they transported the contraband in vehicle bearing Registration No.

KL-21-C-786, which belongs to A16 & A19 (petitioners herein). They kept the contraband in the house of A7, where A3 and his wife A5 are residing. A15 namely, Jalabaga Logeswara Prasath, who is residing in Andhra Pradesh. Through him only, all the accused persons purchased contraband from Andhara Pradesh regularly. Further, A15 used to sell Ganja to A11, A12, A13, A14, A16 and A19. A8 to A10 are residing in Andhra Pradesh. They acted as a dealer and through them, the contraband was purchased from Andhra Pradesh, transported to Tamil Nadu and supplied to the other accused. 5.He would further submit that till date 20 persons were arrayed as accused. A5, A6, A7, A9, A10 & A20 are absconding.

When the respondent police collecting the call details, it was found that all the accused had large network and also close access in dealing the drug trafficking in Tamilnadu.

6.He would further submit that the contraband recovered from these petitioners also. The first petitioner is having contact with A12. Rs.1,70,000/- was paid to the account of A12. the contraband involved in this case is commercial quantity and the investigation is in very preliminary stage. Hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioners.

7.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the facts that the contraband involved in this case is commercial quantity and the investigation is in very preliminary stage, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 8.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 03/11/2022 / TRUE COPY / /11/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

dss 2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI..

2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DHADIKOMBU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16650 of 2022 Date :03/11/2022 RK/VR/SAR-3(17/11/2022) 3P/4C 3/3