M.Syed Sulaiman, v. The Chief Executive Officer,
W.P.(MD).No.5324 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD).No.5324 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2014 M.Syed Sulaiman Secretary, Tarigathul Sadhulya Puthumanai Mugalla ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffar Sarang Street, Vallal Seedha Kadi Nagar, Chennai.
2.The Superintendent of Wakf, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Tirunelveli High Road, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.
3.The Inspectors of Wakfs, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Thenkasi, Tirunelveli District.
4.The Secretary, Masjid-E-Mubarak and Madrasathul Hameedia Pallivasal, Puthumanai Mohalla, Swarnapuram Street, Thenkasi.
... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, by directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.03.2014 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court and thereby prohibit the fourth respondent or his men or agent or any one from collecting any amount under the guise of conducting Kandoori Festival on 08.04.2014 or any other date, with 1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P.(MD).No.5324 of 2014 respect to the Mahan Sahul Hameed Nayagam Dargah which is otherwise called as Nagoor Meera Sha Andavar Dargah situated at Puthumanai 2nd Street, Puthumanai Mohalla, Thenkasi, Tirunelveli District.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Prithiviraj For R-4 : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen
ORDER
Mr.P.R.Prithiviraj, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the issue raised has now become infructuous. The statement is recorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Nsr/Lm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. W.P.(MD).No.5324 of 2014 19.11.2021 RK(30/11/2021) 2P 1C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2