Periyakaruppan v. The Inspector Ofpolice
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Nineteenth day of July Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.12037 of 2016 1 PERIYAKARUPPAN 2 SANKAR 3 M.PITCHAI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3 Vs THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE PALAIYANUR POLICE STATION SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.44 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S S.RAJAGURU Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANNITHEVAN, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Section 379(NH) of IPC in Crime No.44 of 2016, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive the petitioners abused the defacto complainant and also threatened him with dire consequences. On complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioners.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the investigation of the case is pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am until further orders.
[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 19/07/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE PALAIYANUR POLICE STATION SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
+One cc to Mr.S.Sivaprakash, Advocate, SR.No.37621 RL/6C/2P/DB/SARII/22/7/2016
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.12037 of 2016 Date :19/07/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/