K.Murugan v. The Superintendent Of Police
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12313 of 2016 .BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.01.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12313 of 2016 K.Murugan ... Petitioner -vs1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Bodi, Theni District.
3.Pandeeswari 4.Thonthithevar 5.Rani 6.Pandikumar ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to direct the second respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner on the basis of the representation given by the petitioner on 14.07.2016.
For Petitioner :
No appearance For R1 and R2 :
Mr.A.Robinson Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for final hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
2.The petitioner seeks police protection. The petitioner has only filed a civil suit. He has not obtained any enforceable decree from the Civil Court. Therefore, the question of granting police protection does not arise.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12313 of 2016 3.Leaving open the rights of the petitioner to seek remedies in the manner known to law, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) pnn To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Bodi, Theni District.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12313 of 2016 29.01.2020 JMN(10.02.2020) 2P : 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2