Helacis Mayar v. The Branch Manager,
W.P.(MD).No.5416 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.(MD).No.5416 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2014 Helacis Mayar ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Branch Manager, Syndicate Bank, Nagercoil Branch, W.C.C. Road, Kanyakumari District, Pin - 629 001.
2.The Deputy General Manager, Srinivasa Apartments, Nanthini Street, Velmurugan Nagar, Bye-pass Road, Madurai.
... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, by directing the first respondent to permit the petitioner to redeem the jewellery by closing jewel accounts bearing Nos. 1)6182/131/117220 2)6182/131/117418 3)6182/131/115274 4)6182/131/137510 5)6182/131/144260 6)6182/131/145258 7)6182/131/825/9401, after paying the full dues in the respective accounts forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.R.Pandivel Standing Counsel
ORDER
Heard Mr.S.Palanivelayutham, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Pandivel, learned Standing Counsel who appears for the respondents.
2. Mr.R.Pandivel, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents states that the jewels which were the subject matter of the present Writ Petition had been redeemed by the petitioner. As a matter of fact, the entire issue travelled up to the Supreme Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
W.P.(MD).No.5416 of 2014
3. By recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, if the petitioner still has any grievance, she may take necessary steps in accordance with law with any authority or approach any Court in the manner to known to law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (A.D II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Nsr/Lm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
W.P.(MD).No.5416 of 2014 19.11.2021 RS(30.11.2021) 2P 1C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2