Vanitha v. The Superintendent Of Police

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9425 of 2018 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.11.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9425 of 2018 Vanitha ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kallimanthayam Police Station, Dindigul District.

.. Respondents/Complainants 3.Selvaraj 4.Sivakumar 5.Mohanraj 6.Kuppusamy 7.Sarasu 8.Natchimuthu 9.Velusamy ... Respondents/Defacto Complainants PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and her family members as per her representation dated 05.06.2018. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Gokul Raj For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and her family members based on her representation dated 05.06.2018.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 would submit that the petitioner sent a complaint to the respondents 1 & 2 on 05.06.2018 for adequate police protection.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9425 of 2018

3. It is seen that after a lapse of one and a half years, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be considered. Hence, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh complaint before the second respondent. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kallimanthayam Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

DSS Crl.O.P.(MD) No.9425 of 2018 05.11.2019 sma(25.11.2019) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2