Madras High CourtWP(MD)/14993/2015closed

P.Virumandi v. The Commissioner

2021-01-05Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.14993 of 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.01.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.14993 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 P.Virumandi : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Anna Maligai, Madurai District.

2.The Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Anna Maligai, Madurai District.

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Office of the Assistant Commissioner, Zone 4, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

4.P.Sivanammal (Died) 5.P.Mukesh : Respondents (R5 impleaded vide order of this Court in W.M.P.(MD)No.13173 of 2017, dated 05.01.2021) PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 from passing any order on application of the respondent No.4 for modification of entries in the property tax assessment records pertaining to the petitioner's property in S.No.472/1, Madakulam Village, Pykara, Madurai District, without hearing the petitioner. For Petitioner :Mr.T.Lajapathy Roy For R1 :Mr.R.Prabu Ramachandran For R5 :Mr.M.Kannan **** https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.14993 of 2015

ORDER

Heard the learned Counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner claims to be the owner of the petition mentioned property.

The fourth respondent applied to the Corporation for mutation of the assessment records. For forbearing the authorities from passing orders thereon or from mutating the entries in the records, this Writ Petition came to be filed. 3.The Corporation has filed a counter affidavit and it appears to be in favour of the petitioner herein. But the respondent Corporation stated that on account of the pendency of the Writ Petition, they could not pass final orders. Therefore, the Writ Petition is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to move this Court, if situation arises. The first respondent is directed to pass orders on the application of the fourth respondent. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cmr +1 CC to M/s.R.PRABHU RAMA CHANDRAN, Advocate ( SR-183[F] dated 06/01/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate ( SR-220[F] dated 06/01/2021 ) W.P.(MD)No.14993 of 2015 05.01.2021 (2/2) PU(CO) KK(02.02.2021) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2