Sathishkumar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.16898 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No.11332 & 11333 of 2022 1.Sathishkumar 2.Sureshkumar ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2 Vs.
1.The Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Madurai District.
(Crime No.11/2021).
...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Sasikumar ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records in C.C.No.240 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, and quash the same as against these Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Arun Kumar For R1 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.C.Ragupathi 1/4
O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition is filed to call for the records in C.C.No.240 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, and quash the same as against these Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2.
2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.11 of 2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 506(i) and 326 IPC, against the petitioners. 3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels. 4.The petitioners and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is 2/4
recorded.
5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 26.09.2022, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, all further proceedings in C.C.No.240 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, is quashed and the compromise memo is recorded.
6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in C.C.No.240 of 2022, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
20.11.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Indu 3/4
G.ILANGOVAN. J.
Indu To 1.The learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kallikudi Police Station, Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.16898 of 2022 20.11.2023 4/4