Kanagalakshmi v. The Inspector Of Police
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13889 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.09.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13889 of 2019
1. Kanagalakshmi
2. Sudalaimani
3. AthiParasakthi 4.Kanagaraj ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4 Vs.
1. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Ottapidaram Police Station Tuticorin District.
: Respondent/Complainant 2.Mookkammal : 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records in C.C.No. 77 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Vilathikulam and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Banuprasath For R-1 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R2 : Mr.V.Malaiyendran, Advocate
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 77 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Vilathikulam , for an alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323,506(i) of IPC r/w.Section 4 of TNPHW Act. 2.The case is under trial. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.
3.A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. The petitioners and the second respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were identified by Mr. Ramesh Kumar, SI of Police. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.
4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13889 of 2019 the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the proceedings in C.C.No.77 of 2018 5.This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in C.C.No. 77 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Vilathikulam , is quashed and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. The petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as costs, to the credit of the Chief Justice Relief Fund (payable in Accounts Section of the High Court Registry), within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar () // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) aav Enclose: Xerox Copy of Joint Compromise Memo. To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Vilathikulam.
2. The Inspector of Police, Ottapidaram Police Station, Tuticorin District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Copy to: The Section Officer, Accounts Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.P. BANU PRASATH, Advocate SR-90641. Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13889 of 2019 30.09.2019 CS(17.10.2019) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2