Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9525/2018dismissed

S.Joshep v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-11-05Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.11.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN S.Joshep ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

.. Respondents/Complainants 3.Sounder Rajan, 4.Varkis 5.Oovariyan Jeorge @ Jeorge 6.Jeorge 7.Sekar @ Auto Sekar 8.Raja 9.Kishore 10.Prabu 11.Siluvai 12.Palasis 13.Thilak 14.Manoj 15.Raknesh 16.Vincent 17.Jonas Iyansingh 18.Leon @ Pattu 19.Sesu Puthiran 1/4

20.Rethinam 21.Prasanth 22.George @ Kavutta George 23.Antony 24.Alwin 25.Denson @ Dennison 26.Karol 27.Anthony 28.Santhi Rayappan 29.Mathiyazhagan 30.Thinesh 31.Alish 32.Keni 33.Ranjan 34.Peeter 35.John 36.Karan 37.Rukku @ Arulanantham 38.Prabu 39.Sangeetham 40.Mathan 41.Edmend 42.Doni 43.Santhiyagu 44.Micheal 2/4

45.Rajan 46.Sanjay 47.Johnson 48.Arjun 49.Kingsili 50.Sumathi 51.Pungavanam 52.Menaka 53.Rani ... Respondents/Defacto Complainants PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the second respondent to give adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner on the basis of his complaint to the respondents 1 & 2 dated 15.05.2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Venkatesan For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate( Crl.Side) For R-3 to R-23, R-25 to R-48 R-50 to R-53 : Mr.K.Vamanan

ORDER

This petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to give adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner on the basis of his complaint to the respondents 1 & 2 dated 15.05.2018.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that on the complaint lodged by the petitioner as well as the respondents 3 to 53, the second respondent registered a case in both complaints in Crime No.117 of 2018 and Crime No.118 of 2018. After completion of investigation, they have filed final report in both crime numbers and the same have been taken cognizance before the concerned 3/4

jurisdictional Magistrate.

3.In view of the above, at this stage, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be considered. Hence, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh complaint before the second respondent.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS III) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) dss To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyamumari District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.S.RAMASAMY, Advocate ( SR-96506[F] dated 06/11/2019 ) 05.11.2019 KK/SAR/18.11.2019/4P-5C/ 4/4