Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17624/2016disposed of

Kuttithanagam, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2016-10-24Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of October Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.17624 of 2016 KUTTITHANAGAM, ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALLI POLICE STATION, SRIVILLIPUTHUR T.K.

VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT IN CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.MAYAPERUMAL Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 406, 420 and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.Not known on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail.

2. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that before the Civil Court, UCO Bank has filed a case against the petitioner and others and the petitioner undertakes to pay the entire amount of Rs.2.5 lakhs to the victim within a period of two weeks.

3. It is seen that on 26.09.2016, this Court had granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Even though this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail, as the petitioner has agreed to pay the entire amount to the victims within a period of two weeks, the petitioner shall not be arrested for a period of two weeks and she shall appear before the respondent police for a period of two weeks and if she failed to pay the amount within a period of two weeks, the police is empowered to take appropriate action. She shall not leave the place of residence without the consent of the respondent police. In case, the petitioner leaves the place without the knowledge of the respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

police, it is open to the respondent to bring it to the attention of the Court to pass appropriate orders. Pendency of the civil suit is not a bar for the accused to pay the entire amount, as the petitioner has promised to pay the entire amount to the victim. sd/- 24/10/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, SRIVILLIPUTHUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALLI POLICE STATION, SRIVILLIPUTHUR T.K.

VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.S.MAYAPERUMAL Advocate SR.No.63367 sm:GSV-PM:SAR 3:01/11/2016:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17624 of 2016 Date :24/10/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/