Mari v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date :30/07/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI Mari : Petitioner/Accused Rank not known Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by, the Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

(Crime No.219 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.B.Mahendrarajan, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.219 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent 1/6

police for the offences punishable under section 303(2) of BNS r/w Section 21(4) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.219 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 11.07.2025, when the defacto complainant/VAO was in patrol near Kappakudi Village bus stand, the petitioner/accused has illegally transported 1 unit of savudu sand in Massey Ferguson 241 D1 tractor. Hence, a case has been registered. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person, and is no way connected with the alleged occurrence as stated by the prosecution. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is not having any previous case. He seeks anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submits that there are totally two accused in this case. The petitioner/A1 is the driver and the A2 is the owner of the vehicle. The accused has illegally transported one unit of savudu sand. He further submits that the properties and the vehicle were recovered and the investigation is in progress and the petitioner is not having any previous case. 2/6

However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the offence, and considering the fact that the properties have been recovered and also the fact that the petitioner is not having any bad antecedents, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: (a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; 3/6

(b) the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand only) to the credit of the District Mineral Foundation Trust, Ramanathapuram District as Non-refundable deposit and on such deposit being made, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner; (c) the petitioner shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District. In the event of any change in his residential address, the petitioner shall report the same to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District; (d) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

(e) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(f) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (g) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560] and; 4/6

(h) if the accused/petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023.

sd/- 30/07/2025 / TRUE COPY / /08/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

DAS TO 1 The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram .

2 Do Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District.

3 The Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4 The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.B.MAHENDRARAJAN, Advocate ( SR-8282[I] dated 01/08/2025 ) 5/6

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12654 of 2025 Date :30/07/2025 NM/20.08.2025/ 6P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 6/6