Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18540/2016dismissed

T.Michael Stanis Prabhu @ v. The Inspector Of Police,

2020-07-22Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18540 of 2016 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.07.2020

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18540 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.9249 of 2016 T.Michael Stanis Prabhu @ Prabu :Petitioner/A1 Vs.

1.The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Tuticorin, In Crime No.279 of 2010. :Respondent/Complainant 2.K.Sivan, Personal Assistant to the District Collector (General), O/o.The District Collectorate, Tuticorin.

:No 2 Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records pertaining to the case in Crime No.279 of 2010 under Sections 147, 342, 285, 353 and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Aravind Raj For Respondent No.1 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

The present petition has been filed to quash the case registered in Crime No.279 of 2010 on the file of the first respondent.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the first respondent would submit that the case registered in Crime No.279 of 2010 has been closed under Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, on the ground of limitation by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.3, Tuticorin.

3. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (ADII) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18540 of 2016 Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

SML To 1.The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Tuticorin.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18540 of 2016 22.07.2020 KB(29.07.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2