Fathima Beevi v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
W.P.(MD).No.789 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.11.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD).No.789 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 Fathima Beevi ... Petitioner -Vs1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-6.
3.The Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, E.V.K.Sampath Maligai, DPI Compound College Road, Chennai-6.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to provide full grace marks for the questions Nos.22, 35, 38, 45, 51, 52, 58, 70, 75, 76, 89, 91, 92, 96, 97, 109, 113, 115, 117, 128, 145 of the Booklet Series-B of Written Competitive Examination for Direct Recruitment of Post Graduate Assistants (2012-2013) for the subject Tamil and consequently to consider the petitioner for recruitment to the post of Post Graduate Assistants (Tamil) within the time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Seemaraj For Respondents : Mr.J.Gunaseelanmuthiah Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the third respondent to provide full grace marks for the questions Nos.22, 35, 38, 45, 51, 52, 58, 70, 75, 76, 89, 91, 92, 96, 97, 109, 113, 115, 117, 128, 145 of the Booklet Series-B of Written Competitive Examination for Direct Recruitment of Post Graduate Assistants (2012-2013) for the subject Tamil and consequently to consider the petitioner for recruitment to the post of Post Graduate Assistants (Tamil) within the time stipulated by https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
W.P.(MD).No.789 of 2014 this Court.
2.The grievances of the writ petitioner is that she participated in the process of selection for appointment to the post of Post Graduate Assistant in Tamil. The petitioner found several printing mistakes in the question paper circulated to her. She brought to the notice of the invigilator in the examination hall and she was unable to do anything with reference to the mistakes in the question paper. In this context, the petitioner states that full marks are to be granted to the questions, which all are printed with some mistakes.
3.This Court is of the considered opinion that the recruitment was of the year 2012-13 and the issues regarding grant of marks with reference to the recruitment were settled long back and the selected persons were appointed and working for the past more than seven years. If at all any other grievances exist for the petitioner, it is left open to her to approach the competent authorities for redressal of her grievances.
4.With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-I) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) sji To 1.The Principal Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-6.
3.The Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, E.V.K.Sampath Maligai, DPI Compound College Road, Chennai-6. +1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-22506[F] dated 23/11/2020 ) W.P.(MD).No.789 of 2014 20.11.2020 PM(CO) TR(03.12.2020) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2