H.A.Mahoamed Ali, v. The District Collector,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :19.01.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU H.A.Mohamed Ali ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

4.The General Manager, Reliance Tele Communication Limited, Chennai.

... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 4th respondent from doing all further construction and tower works in Pallapatti Old

Survey No.20 and UDR Survey No.20/4 and Town Survey Number T.S.No. 83, Ward No.9, Plot No.2, Door No.36G, Palani Road, Dindigul District. For Petitioner :Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar For Respondents :Mr.V.Om.Prakash Government Advocate for R1 to R3

O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had passed away and he is still not able to trace the legal heirs. 2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.

19.01.2023 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order sbn

To 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

sbn 19.01.2023