Madras High CourtWP(MD)/865/2014disposed of

M. Anguvel v. The District Manager

2019-08-09Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

W.P.(MD) No.865 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.08.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD) No.865 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 M.Anguvel ... Petitioner vs.

The District Manager Madurai North Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC) Madurai Having Office at Ramanathapuram Main Road Manalur, Sivagangai District ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.03/2013/H dated 27.12.2013 and quash the same. For Petitioner :

Mr.R.V.Rajkumar For Respondent :

Mr.H.Arumugam

O R D E R

The order of suspension dated 27.12.2013, passed by the respondent, is under challenge in the present writ petition.

2. The writ petitioner was placed under suspension on account of certain serious allegations.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that on account of the interim stay granted by this Court, the writ petitioner has been reinstated into service and now, he is working. The learned counsel further states that the respondent may be permitted to conclude the departmental disciplinary proceedings and pass orders.

4. It is made clear that the suspension order need not be reopened and the writ petitioner may be allowed to continue in service. However, in respect of the departmental disciplinary proceedings, the respondent shall proceed with the enquiry, conclude https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/4

W.P.(MD) No.865 of 2014 the same as expeditiously as possible and pass final orders in the departmental disciplinary proceedings. The writ petitioner is also directed to co-operative for the early disposal of the departmental disciplinary proceedings and in the event of non-cooperation, the same may be recorded in the proceedings itself. This being the factum, the respondent shall conclude the proceedings as early as possible.

5. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Krk +1 CC to M/s.H.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-81321[F] dated 13/08/2019 ) W.P.(MD) No.865 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 09.08.2019 KK/SAR/26.08.2019/2P-2C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/4