Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12978/2018closed

R.Ananthavalli, v. State Of Tamil Nadu

2021-02-01Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.02.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and W.M.P(MD) No.11866 of 2018 R.Ananthavalli ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The Director of School Education, O/o. The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

3.The Joint Director of School Education (Higher Secondary), O/o The Joint Director of School Education (Higher Secondary), DPI Campus, Chennai - 6.

4.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

5.The District Educational Officer, O/o. The District Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

6.The Headmaster, Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Madurai, Madurai District.

... Respondents P RAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.5993/A4/2017 dated 14.06.2018 on the file of the respondent No.4 and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioner :

Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents :

Mr.A.Thiyagarajan Government Advocate

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. 1/3

2.The petitioner is aggrieved against the redeployment order passed by the third respondent herein. When the writ petition came to be entertained on 19.06.2018, the impugned order of redeployment came to be stayed by this Court. Thereafter, three years have lapsed and the respondents have neither filed their counter affidavit nor sought for vacating the interim order. 3.It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Teachers, who were sought to be redeployed, are continued in the same petitioner school till date. It is also the submission that pending the writ petition, the students strength in the school staff have changed considerably and if re-assesment of the TeachersStudents ratio is made, the question of redeployment of Teacher may not arise.

4.In these circumstances, this Court is of the view that the re-assessment of the student-staff strength could be made and thereafter, the respondents can come to the conclusion as to whether there are any surplus teachers in the school and whether redeployment is required or not.

5.In this background, the petitioner is directed to give a representation to the third respondent, in the light of the observations made in this order, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such representation being made, the third respondent shall pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. Till the disposal of the representation, the respondent shall maintain status quo in connection with the petitioner's service.

6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. 2/3

To 1.The Principal Secretary Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.