K.M.A. Meeran v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.02.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 10039 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No. 4494 of 2018

1. K.M.A. Meeran

2. K.M.A. Abdul Khadar

3. K.M.A. Mohammed Rafeek

4. K.M.A. Parveen

5. Kamrunnisha

...Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 5

Vs.

1. The State through the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.

...

R-1/Complainant

2. H. Ashok ... R-2/Defacto complainant PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Crime No.07 of 2018 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same as against these petitioners.

For Petitioners: Mr.KA. Raamakrishnan For R-1 : Mrs.S.Bharathi, Government Advocate (crl. Side) For R-2 : D.Selvaraj

O R D E R

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No. 7 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent police as against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 120B, 420 and 506(1) of IPC.

2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners did not commit any offences as alleged in the impugned FIR. Without any base, the first respondent police registered a case as against the petitioners in Crime No. 7 of 2018 for the offences under Sections 120B, 420 and 506(1) of IPC. Hence he prayed to quash the same.

3. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that investigation is still pending and this petition is in premature stage and hence, he prayed for dismissal of this petition.

4. Perused the materials available on record.

5. It is seen from the First Information Report that there are specific allegation as against the petitioners, which has to be investigated. Further the FIR is not an encyclopedia and it need not contain all facts. Further, it cannot be quashed in the threshold. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

This Court finds that the FIR discloses prima facie commission of cognizable offence and as such this Court cannot interfere with the investigation. The investigating machinery has to investigate, grab and unearth the crime in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the Code.

6. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to quash the FIR in Crime No. 7 of 2018 as against the petitioners. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. Further the respondent police is directed to complete the investigation and file final report before the concerned Court within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ksa To

1. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.S.SARVAGAN PRABHU, Advocate ( SR-5847[F] Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10039 of 2018 11.02.2020 SMA/03/03/2020/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/