Sheik Dawood.A.M.S. v. Bank Of Baroda

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.11.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD W.P.(MD) No.22135 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD) No.16290 of 2022

1. A.M.S.Sheik Dawood

2. Rehimath Nisha,

3. Nabeesha Alias Ayisha Siddik,

4. A.K.Ayeesha Banu

5. M.Najma Banu

6. A.Subaitha Begam ... Petitioners -vs1. Bank of Baroda, Karaikudi Branch, Represented by its Authorized Officer, Mr.Santhosh, S/o K.R.Jayachandran, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

2. M/s.Y.A.Mohaideen Andavar Rie Mill, Through its Proprietor, M.S.Mohamed Shabudeen, 10.05.6, Nagappa Chettiar Street, Puduvayal, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

3. Mohamed Shabudeen.A.M.S, S/o A.M.Shahul Hameed, 10.05.6 Nagappa Chettiar Street, Puduvayal, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to proceedings made in sale notice for sale of immovable properties, dated 09.09.2022 on the file of first respondent, quash the same. For Petitioners :

Mr.R.Sundar For Respondents :

Mr.P.Pethurajesh for R1

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel for the parties submitted that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication.

2. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. [R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 17.11.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No pkn

R.MAHADEVAN , J.

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD , J.

pkn W.P.(MD) No.22135 of 2022 17.11.2022