Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9842/2014dismissed as withdrawal

R.Devika Rani, v. State Of Tamil Nadu,

2019-08-01Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.08.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and M.P.[MD]Nos.1,1,1,1,2,2,2 & 2 of 2014 R.Devika Rani : Petitioner in W.P.[MD]No.9842/2014 B.Kavitha : Petitioner in W.P.[MD]No.9843/2014 G.Kavitha : Petitioner in W.P.[MD]No.9844/2014 K.Sudha : Petitioner in W.P.[MD]No.9845/2014 Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Chennai - 9.

2.The State Project Director, State Project Directorate, DPI Campus, Chennai - 6.

3.The Director of School Education, O/o. The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai - 6.

4.The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel), O/o. Joint Director of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai - 6.

5.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

6.The Additional Chief Educational Officer (SSA), Sarva Shiksh Abhiyan, District Project Office, Madurai, Madurai District.

7.The Supervisor (Incharge), Block Resource Centre, District Project Officer, Madurai West, Madurai District.

... Respondents in all 1/6

COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writs of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of deployment transfer in Na.Ka.No.43093/Si4/E1/2014, dated 16.06.2014 on the file of the fourth respondent and the consequential relieving order in Na.Ka.No.172/A.Ka.E/2014, dated 17.06.2014 on the file of the seventh respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents 4 to 7 to retain the petitioner within Madurai district. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karthik force Mr.T.Lajapathy Roy For Respondents : Mr.S.Srimathy Special Government Pleader [In all Writ Petitions] COMMON ORDER The learned Counsel for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the writ petitioner, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Chennai - 9.