Madras High CourtWP(MD)/13413/2018dismissed for nonprosecution

S.Rathinavel, v. The Commissioner,

2020-11-30Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.13413 of 2018 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD)No.13413 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.12218 and 12219 of 2018 S.Rathinavel ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

2. The Assistant Commissioner, Zone No.2, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

3.Banumathi 4.Jeyalakshmi 5.Meenambal 6.M.Umarani ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, by calling for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent in M2A12/17043/2017, dated 27.04.2018 and to quash the same, inconsequently direct the second respondent to restore the petitioner's name in the municipal tax assessment for the residential building comprised in Door No.112/49A, Ahimsapuram 5th street, Madurai in T.S.No.1699/3.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.K.Govindarajan Standing Counsel

ORDER

Today, the matter is listed under the caption "For Dismissal". There was no representation on the side of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.13413 of 2018 petitioner on the last hearing date i.e., on 04.11.2020. As seen from the earlier proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioner has repeatedly seeking adjournments in this matter. Today also, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be inferred that the writ petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this Writ Petition.

2.Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tsg Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned. +1 CC to Mr.K.GOVINDARAJAN, Advocate SR-23697. Order made in W.P.(MD)No.13413 of 2018 30.11.2020 PK(CO) CS(11.12.2020) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2