V.Mathiyalagan, v. The Tashildhar,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.08.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Writ Petition (MD) No.18529 of 2015 and MP(MD) No.1 of 2015 V.Mathiyalagan ....

Petitioner -Vs1.The Tahsildar Aravakkurichi Taluk Karur District, Karur.

2.R.Thiruvengadam .... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.A2/6042/2014 dated 27.01.2015 and to quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajagopalan For Respondents : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader - for R1 Mr.N.Karthikeya Venkatachalapathy - for R2

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

1 / 3

2. The second respondent is a Court auction purchaser. The impugned mutations were made in the revenue records only on the strength of the court order. Of course, the order was passed straight away without notice to the writ petitioner and only copy of the order was marked to the petitioner.

3. However, on this ground the writ Court will not be justified in interfering with the impugned order. The impugned order itself states that it is appealable before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur. The petitioner is permitted to avail the appeal remedy. If any appeal is filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the same shall be entertained without reference to limitation. With this liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 23.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No KST To The Tahsildar Aravakkurichi Taluk Karur District, Karur.

2 / 3

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

KST W.P.(MD) No.18529 of 2015 23.08.2023 3 / 3