← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18112/2021dismissed

M.Venkatesan v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-11-19Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/11/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.18112 of 2021 M.Venkatesan ... Petitioner/Accused No.5 Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Peraiyur Police Station, Peraiyur, Madurai District.

(Crime No.335 of 2021).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Arun Kumar S M, Advocate. For Respondent : M/s.RMS.Sethuraman, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.335 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A5, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 452, 294(b), 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, r/w 3, 4 of Tamil Nadu Prevention of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act, in Crime No. 328 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was money dispute between petitioner and the defacto complainant, due to which, the petitioner and other accused persons trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and taken away some documents, which was kept in her house and also threatened her with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that there was some dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, due to money transaction, the petitioner along with others trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and threatened her with dire consequences. 5.Considering the seriousness and gravity of the offence alleged by the prosecution and also the facts that the co-accused is in judicial custody and that investigation is not yet completed, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this point of time.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Sd/- 19/11/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

DAS Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.The Inspector of Police, Peraiyur Police Station, Peraiyur, Madurai District. (Cr.No. 335 of 2021).

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18112 of 2021 Date :19/11/2021 SP/PN/SAR IV/25/11/2021/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/