← Library
Madras High CourtWA(MD)/2261/2024dismissed

The Government Of Tamil Nadu, v. M R Deepthi Evans

2024-11-07Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh,Honourable Dr.Justice A.D.Maria Clete6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.11.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and C.M.P.(MD)No.15803 of 2024 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, D.P.I. Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil, 4.The District Educational Officer, Thiruvattar, : Appellants Vs.

1/6

1.M.R.Deepthi Evans 2.Higher Secondary School, Rep. by its Chairman and Correspondent, Arumanai - 629 151, : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order dated 14.03.2024 in W.P.(MD)No. 16121 of 2020.

For Appellants : Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader For Respondent No.1 : Mr.M.Saravanan For Respondent No.2 : Mr.K.Ragatheesh Kumar for M/s.Isaac Chambers

JUDGMENT

************** [Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.S.RAMESH, J.] Challenge is made to the order of the learned Single Judge dated 14.03.2024 in W.P.(MD)No.16121 of 2020. 2.It is not in dispute that the second respondent school is a minority stand alone institution. The case of the appellants before the Writ Court was that when the authorities had declared 6 B.T. 2/6

Assistant [Science] teachers as surplus, the school ought not to have appointed the first respondent herein to the said post but rather ought to have deployed one of the surplus teachers in the said vacancy.

3.Learned Single Judge has placed reliance on paragraph No.95(v) of the decision of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD)No.76 of 2019 dated 31.03.2021 and had allowed the writ petition. As per the said judgment, when an aided minority institution is a stand alone institution, their right to fill up a vacancy will not be affected merely on the presence of surplus teachers.

4.In the instant Appeal, the learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that when 6 B.T.Assistant (Science) teachers have been declared surplus, the respondents ought to have appointed one of the surplus teachers in the vacancy for the post of P.G. Assistant Physics. It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the school that all the 6 B.T.Assistant (Science) teachers who have been declared as surplus possess the qualification of B.Sc., B.Ed., whereas the qualification prescribed for the vacant post of P.G. Assistant Physics is M.Sc., in Physics with B.Ed., degree. Since none of the surplus teachers had possessed required essential qualification for the post of P.G. 3/6

Assistant, they were constrained to appoint the first respondent herein to the said post.

5.We are of the view that the school is justified in taking such a stand. When there is no bar for an aided minority institution which is a stand alone institution to fill up the vacancy even when excess teachers are identified in their schools and when the surplus teachers declared by the authorities did not possess the required qualification, they could not have accommodated one of these teachers to the vacant post of P.G. Assistant. In view of the above, the stand taken by the appellants is not justifiable. Hence, there are no merits in this Writ Appeal.

6.Accordingly, this Writ Appeal fails and the same is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

[M.S.R.,J.] & [A.D.M.C.,J.] 07.11.2024 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No MR 4/6

To 1.The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, D.P.I. Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil, 4.The District Educational Officer, Thiruvattar, 5/6

M.S.RAMESH, J.

and A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

MR JUDGMENT MADE IN 07.11.2024 6/6