Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14902/2023dismissed as infructuous

Sheela Mohan v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-09-22Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 22/09/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Sheela Mohan ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs 1.The State, represented by The Inspector of Police, Bodinayakkanur Town, Theni District.

(Crime No.333 of 2023).

... Respondent/Complainant 2.Sayed Ibrahim ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.B.ABDUL SAMATH, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.NAMBISELVAN, Additional Public Prosecutor.

For Defacto Complainant : Mr.K.PRAKASH, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.333 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 IPC, 1/3

1960, in Crime No.333 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the entire amount has been settled between the parties. The joint compromise memo is also filed by the petitioner and the second respondent. The terms and conditions of the settlement are follows:

3. 'The dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent/ defacto complainant settled in the Mediation Centre and the petitioner is agreed to pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- and the defacto complainant is also accepted the same. The petitioner paid Rs.1,00,000/- to the second respondent through RTGS on 11.09.2023 and paid the balance amount of Rs.1,50,000/- by way of State Bank of India, Anna Nagar Branch, Chennai through Demand Draft No.278948, dated 21.09.2023. Now the second respondent/ defacto complainant is ready to withdraw the Criminal Case in Crime No.333 of 2023 on the file of the first respondent herein.'

4. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the parties are coming from Chennai, let the statements of the parties be recorded today by the respondent, who is present before this Court and close the above said First Information Report filed against the petitioner. 2/3

5. With the above said development, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

sd/- 22/09/2023 / TRUE COPY / /09/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

INDU TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BODINAYAKKANUR TOWN, THENI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +2 CC to M/s.B.ABDUL SAMATH, Advocate ( SR-14061[I] dated 22/09/2023 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14902 of 2023 Date :22/09/2023 SA/VRS/SAR. /29.09.2023/3P/4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023. 3/3