Jesudurai v. The Inspector Of Police

BAIL SLIP The Criminal Revision Petitioner Jesudurai, S/o.Santhanam Nadar,Accused No.1 was directed to be released on Bail vide order dated in Crl.MP(MD) No.5800/2016 in Crl.RC(MD)483/2016, dated 19.07.2016 on the file of the Madurai Bench of Mdras High Court. BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON 18.03.2021 DELIVERED ON 05.05.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI Crl.RC(MD)No. 483 of 2016 Jesudurai ... Petitioner/Appellant/A-1 Vs.

The Inspector of Police, CCIW Thoothukudi, [Crime No. 01 of 2009].

... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Revisions filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records and to allow the revision and set aside the conviction and sentence dated 02.09.2015, made in C.C. No. 24 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, (CCIW Special Court), Tirunelveli, as confirmed by the Judgment dated 22.04.2016 made in Crl.A. No.48 of 2015 on the file of the I Additional District Sessions Judge, Tuticorin. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Anandakumar For Respondent : Mrs.M. Anantha Devi Government Advocate (crl.side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the revision petitioner to set aside the conviction and sentence, dated 02.09.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, (CCIW Special Court), Tirunelveli, in C.C. No. 24 of 2009 as confirmed by the Judgment, dated 22.04.2016 passed by the learned I Additional District Sessions Judge, Tuticorin, in Crl.A. No.48 of 2015.

2. As against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, (CCIW Special Court), Tirunelveli, in C.C. No. 24 of 2009, dated 02.09.2015, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the learned I Additional District Sessions Judge, Tuticorin, in Crl.A.No.48 of 2015. The lower Appellate Court, by judgment dated 22.04.2016, dismissed the

appeal and the conviction and sentence to undergo simple imprisonment of One year and to pay a fine of Rs.4,000/-under each sections and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for One month for each offences for the offences under Sections 408, 467, 468, 471 & 477(A) of IPC, was confirmed. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has preferred the instant criminal revision case.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner already undergone the period of sentence. Therefore, nothing survives in the Criminal Revision Case. The said submission is recorded.

5. Recording the aforesaid submission, made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision case stands closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Ksa Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT SESSIONS COURT, TUTICORIN.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICAL MAGISTRATE No.II (CCIW Special Court) TIRUNELVELI.

3.THE CHIEF JUDICAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI.

4.THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE TUTICORIN.

5.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CCIW THOOTHUKUDI.

6.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

7.THE SECTION OFFICER, CRIMINAL SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI (2 Copies) Order made in Crl.RC(MD)No. 483 of 2016 05.05.2021 CN(01.06.2021)3P C9