Madras High CourtCRL RC(MD)/786/2016allowed

Thendral Rani v. Kalavathi,

2020-12-02Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl RC(MD)No.786 of 2016 Thendral Rani ... Petitioner / Appellant / Sole Accused Vs.

Kalavathi ... Respondent/Respondent /Complainant Prayer : This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the judgment and conviction made in C.A No.49 of 2013 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dindigul dated 21.07.2016 confirming the judgment and conviction made in STC No.30 of 2012 by the Fast Track Court (Judicial Magistrate) Palani dated 06.07.2013 and set aside the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar For Respondent : Mr.V.Nagenthiran

ORDER

The revision petitioner is the sole accused in STC No.30 of 2012 on the file of the Fast Track Court (Judicial Magistrate) Palani filed by the respondent herein for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner was convicted and sentenced. The same was also confirmed in appeal. Challenging the same, the petitioner filed this criminal revision case.

2.During the pendency of the revision case, the issue has been amicably resolved. The counsel on either side categorically states that the respondent has accepted the payment from the petitioner herein towards full and final settlement. Since the parties have compounded the matter out of court, the judgments of the courts below are set aside. This criminal revision case is allowed as per the terms of the compromise. The compromise memo shall form part of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Skm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

Encl: Xerox copy of Memo filed by the petitioner. To 1.The Additional Sessions Judge, Dindigul.

2.The Fast Track Judge / Judicial Magistrate, Palani. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl RC(MD)No.786 of 2016 02.12.2012 VB (21.12.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/