← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP(MD)/9299/2024ordered

Esakkimuthu v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2024-09-05Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifth day of September Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR in CRL OP(MD) No.14838 of 2024 1 ESAKKIMUTHU 2 KALIRAJ 3 MAHESHRAJ 4 MAHESH ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS Vs 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, COURTALLAM POLICE STATION, TENKASI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.205/2023).

2 MARIDURAI ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners in STC No.810/2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Sengottai pending disposal of the Criminal Original Petition. 1/3

Prayer in CRL OP(MD). 14838/ 2024 :

To call for the records in STC No.810/2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Sengottai and quash the same as illegal.

Order : This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.KARTHICK A, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.E.ANTONY SAHAYA PRABAHAR, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the 1st Respondent, the court made the following order:- Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the personal appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court is ordered to be dispensed with, on conditions that they shall appear at the time of initial questioning, proceedings under Section 313 of Cr.P.C., and at the time of passing judgment and on the hearings, specifically directed by the trial court.

The petitioners are further directed to give an undertaking in the form of affidavit that they will be duly represented by a counsel on all hearing dates and that the Counsel representing them will cross examine the prosecution witnesses on the same day they are examined in chief. The petitioners shall not dispute the identity of the witnesses. The petitioners shall appear before the Court in the event their presence is insisted by the trial judge for the purpose of identification.

Supreme Court of India, in State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Shambunath Singh, reported in 2001 (4) SCC 667.

sd/- 05/09/2024 / TRUE COPY / /09/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

DAS TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SENGOTTAI.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, COURTALLAM POLICE STATION, TENKASI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN in CRL OP(MD) No.14838 of 2024 Date :05/09/2024 SA/VR/SAR. /20.09.2024/3P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023. 3/3