← Library
Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/917/2016dismissed as infructuous

V.Madurapandian, v. Alagammal,

2023-11-09Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.11.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI C.R.P.(MD) No.917 of 2016 and C.M.P(MD) Nos.4602 of 2016, 11786 of 2018 and 9636 and 9638 of 2021 V.Madurapandian ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Alagammal 2.P.Aruna 3.R.Arunkumar 4.R.Sujadha 5.C.Gnanasoundari 6.C.Bharathi Senthilkumar 7.C.Jeyabharathi 8.C.Bharathi Rajkumar (died) 9.P.Mohana 10.V.Gnaasekar 11.V.Sahadevan 12.V.Jeganathan 13.B.Panchavarnam 14.Minor.Subash

(Minor 13th Respondent rep by her Mother and natural guardian the 12th respondent herein) 15.B.R.Chitrapriya 16.Minor R.Prasanna 17.Minor R.Duraisakthi (Minor R16 & 17 rep by their mother and natural guardian the 15th respondent herein) R15 to R17 bring on record as Lrs of the deceased R8 as per the order dated 28.08.2018 made in CMP(MD) No.7971 to 7973 of 2018.) ... Respondents Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 08.01.2016 made in I.A.No. 615 of 2013 in O.S.No.1064 of 2010 on the file of the Additional III Sub Court, Madurai.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kamalini For R1 to R7 & R15 to R17 : Mr.V.Mari Selvaraj For R9 to R14 : No appearance

ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner fairly states that the suit in respect of which revision petition has been filed challenging the

order in an interlocutory application, has been dismissed and nothing survives for consideration in this Civil Revision Petition.

2. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

09.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes cp To The Additional III Subordinate Judge, Madurai.

P.B. BALAJI, J.

cp C.R.P.(MD) No.917 of 2016 Dated: 09.11.2023