The Principal Secretary Transport Commissioner, v. S. Rathika
SUB A(MD) No.106 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of September Two Thousand and Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.SRIMATHY SUB A(MD) No.106 of 2022 IN CONT P(MD) No.806 of 2022 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI - 600 005, PRESENTLY, S.NATARAJAN, I.A.S., TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF TRANSPORT AND ROAD SAFETY, EZHILAGAM, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-600005.
... PETITIONER/CONTEMNOR Vs S.RATHIKA ASSISTANT, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, THENI, PRESENTLY WORKING AT, S.RATHIKA, ASSISTANT, UNIT OFFICE, PATTUKOTTAI, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to order of dispense with the personal appearance of the Petitioner/ Contemnor herein (i.e., S.Natarajan I.A.S.,) on 23.9.22, in the above said Contempt Petition in Cont.P(MD) No.806 of 2022 in WP(MD) No. 22867 of 2017.
Prayer in CONT P(MD). 806/ 2022 :
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Contemnor for the deliberate and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2
SUB A(MD) No.106 of 2022 willful disobedience of the order dated 15.09.2021 passed by this Honourable Court in W.P. (MD). No. 22867 of 2017. Prayer in WP(MD). 22867/ 2017 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned Government order passed by the 1st respondent in G.O.(2D) No.313 Home (Transport-II) Department dated 25.10.2017 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially direct the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Superintendent from the date on which my immediate junior was promoted.
ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.VEERA KATHIRAVAN, Additional Advocate General Assisted by M/s.D.FARJANA GHOUSIA, Special Government Pleader on behalf of the Petitioner, the court made the following order:- The reasons stated in the Application is accepted. Accordingly, this Sub Application is allowed. Dispensed with for the present.
sd/- 23/09/2022 / TRUE COPY / /09/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO S.NATARAJAN, I.A.S., TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF TRANSPORT AND ROAD SAFETY, EZHILAGAM, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-600005.
ORDER IN SUB A(MD) No.106 of 2022 IN CONT P(MD) No.806 of 2022 Date :23/09/2022 SA/GB/SAR.2/26.09.2022/2P/2C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2