← Library
Madras High CourtREV.APLC(MD)/154/2024dismissed

M.Balamurugan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2025-07-25Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.07.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR in W.A.(MD)No.756 of 2021 M.Balamurugan ...Review Petitioners/Respondent Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015. 3.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

4.The Block Development Officer, Kallal Panchayat Union, Kallal, Sivagangai District.

... Respondents/Appellants PRAYER: Review Application is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C., to review the order made in W.A.(MD).No.756 of 2021, dated 15.04.2024, by allowing the above review petition.

For Petitioner :

Mr.S.Kumar For Respondents :

Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader * * * * * 1/4

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.] The present review application has been filed, seeking to review the order dated 15.04.2024, made in W.A.(MD)No.756 of 2021. 2.We had allowed the Writ Appeal primarily on the ground that the Government Servant cannot rely upon the orders passed by this Court in similar matters, wherein the delay in sending the candidate for Bhavanisagar Training cannot be put against the candidate. However, in the present case, the petitioner herein was not appointed through TNPSC. But he was recruited under the compassionate ground. Therefore, there was a delay in regularising the service by the Government. Only after regularisation of service, the Government Servant could be sent for Bhavanisagar Training. In such circumstances, the petitioner cannot equate himself with other candidates, who were recruited through TNPSC. The grounds raised in the review application are not acceptable. Accordingly, this Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. [S.M.S., J.] [R.V., J.] 25.07.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No RJR 2/4

To 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015. 3.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

4.The Block Development Officer, Kallal Panchayat Union, Kallal, Sivagangai District.

3/4

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

RJR in W.A.(MD)No.756 of 2021 25.07.2025 4/4