Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14227/2019disposed of

Rengalakshmi v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-10-04Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

CRL.O.P.(MD).No.14227 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.10.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL.O.P.(MD).No.14227 of 2019 Rengalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State represented by The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Tahsildar, O/o.Tiruvengadam Taluk Office, Tiruvengadam, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvengadam Police Station, Thiruvengadam, Tirunelveli District.

5.Selvaraj 6.Kandhasamy 7.Chellasamy 8.Jeyabharathi 9.Saranya ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondent No.1 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's two daughter and family members life, limb based on the petitioner's online complaint dated 30.09.2019.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ponraj For R1 to R4 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking direction to direct the respondent No.1 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's two daughter and family members life, limb based on the petitioner's online complaint dated 30.09.2019. 2.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that on the complaint lodged by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL.O.P.(MD).No.14227 of 2019 petitioner as well as the respondents 6 to 9, the fourth respondent registered case in Crime No.231 of 2019 and 232 of 2019. He also submitted that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody in Crime No.231 of 2019.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the grievance of the petitioner is that the parents of the petitioner are age old persons and are being harassed by the counter parties. 4.In view of the above, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted now. However, the fourth respondent is directed to consider the request of the petitioner and also conduct investigation in both First Information Reports and file a final report as expeditiously as possible.

5.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above directions.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Ad-I) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) das To 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District.

3. The Tahsildar, O/o.Tiruvengadam Taluk Office, Tiruvengadam, Tirunelveli District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Thiruvengadam Police Station, Thiruvengadam, Tirunelveli District.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to Mr.P.PONRAJ, Advocate SR-91451.

CRL.O.P.(MD).No.14227 of 2019 04.10.2019 CS(21.10.2019) 2P 7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2