S.Jayabalan, v. Karthick,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Fifth day of February Two Thousand and Twenty Five PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY C.M.P.(MD)Nos.10846 and 10848 of 2023 in W.A.(MD)No. SR 60597 and 60598 of 2023 C.M.P.(MD)No.10846 of 2023:
S.JAYABALAN ... PETITIONER Vs 1 KARTHICK 2 STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TOURISM,CULTURE AND RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, NAMAKKAL KAVIGNAR MALIGAI, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI - 600 009.
3 THE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS 119, UTHAMAR GANDHI SALAI, NUNGAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI - 600 034.
1/5
4 THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, TRICHY - 620 006.
5 ARULMIGHU SUBRAMANIA SWAMY THIRUKOVIL, REPRESENTED BY ITS FIT PERSON /ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KUMARAVAYALUR, SRIRANGAM TALUK, TRICHY - 620 109.
... RESPONDENTS C.M.P.(MD)No.10848 of 2023:
S.PRABU ... PETITIONER Vs.
1. PARAMESHWARAN 2 STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TOURISM,CULTURE AND RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, NAMAKKAL KAVIGNAR MALIGAI, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI - 600 009.
3 THE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS 119, UTHAMAR GANDHI SALAI, NUNGAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI - 600 034.
4 THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, TRICHY - 620 006.
2/5
5 ARULMIGHU SUBRAMANIA SWAMY THIRUKOVIL, REPRESENTED BY ITS FIT PERSON /ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KUMARAVAYALUR, SRIRANGAM TALUK, TRICHY - 620 109.
... RESPONDENTS C.M.P.(MD)Nos.10846 and 10848 of 2023:
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vanchinathan, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.P.Thiyagarajan, Advocate for R1 : Mr.J.Ashok, Additional Government Pleader for R2 to R4 : No appearance for R5 (In both Cases)
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.) These petitions are filed to condone the delay of 229 and 229 days, respectively in filing the above Writ Appeals.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the first respondent and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 2 to 4 in both petitions. Though notice has been served on the fifth respondent Temple in both petitions, none appeared on its behalf. 3/5
3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions and taking into consideration that the respondents 1 to 4 in both petitions have got no objection to condone the delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay of 229 days, however, on payment of costs. 4.Accordingly, these petitions are allowed and the delay is condoned on payment of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only), each to the High Court Legal Services Committee attached to this Bench forthwith on receipt of a copy of this order, failing which these petitions will be dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.
Sd/- 25/02/2025 / TRUE COPY / /03/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
ta 4/5
Copy to:
The Officer incharge, High Court Legal Services Committee , Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
ORDER IN C.M.P.(MD)Nos.10846 and 10848 of 2023 in W.A.(MD)No. SR 60597 and 60598 of 2023 Date :25/02/2025 ES/VR/SAR/10.03.2025/5P/2C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.
5/5