Seyed Fathima v. Maimoon Ayisha Ummal

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.11.2022 CORAM : JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE Seyed Fathima ... Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff Vs 1.Maimoon Ayisa Ummal 2.Azarab 3.Monna Ahamed 4.Kaleel Rahman 5.Mohammed Mira Natchi 6.Mohammed Neina 7.Executive Officer, Kayalpattinam Panchayat, Kayalpattinam.

8.Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Tiruchendur.

... Respondents/ Respondents 1, 2 & 4 to 9/ Defendants 1, 2 & 4 to 9 Prayer:- Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2014 made in A.S.No.67 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tuticorin, confirming the judgment and

decree dated 17.03.2010 made in O.S.No.187 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsif's Court, Tiruchendur. For Appellant :

No appearance For Respondents :

Mr.M.P.Senthil for RR1 &2

J U D G M E N T

This matter is listed today under the caption 'notice section default cases' for want of batta regarding the 6th respondent.

2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appears on behalf of the appellant. The appeal is of the year 2016, and till date the appellant has not taken steps to pay the batta which shows that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, this Court is inclined to dismiss the appeal for default. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

02.11.2022 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No abr

To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin.

2.The Additional District Munsif, Tiruchendur.

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

N.SESHASAYEE, J.

abr 02.11.2022