← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/20856/2021disposed of

Sri Meenakshi Shundareswarar Kovil Kadaikarargal Sangam v. The Secretary To Government Of Tamilnadu

2022-02-23Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.02.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17470, 17468, 17806 and 18002 of 2021 Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar Kovil Kadaikararkal Sangam, represented by its President, Rajunagulu, Madurai.

... Petitioner vs.

1.The Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu, Department of Tourism and Culture, Chepuak, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai - 625 002.

3.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple, Madurai.

4.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Anna Bus Stand, Madurai.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned order passed by the second respondent in Ma.Va4/00600/2021 dated 10.11.2021 and to quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to direct the second respondent to give priority to the members of the petitioner's association by allotting shops that are constructed at the Multilevel Car Parking of Old Central Market, Madurai.

For Petitioner :Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy for Mr.A.Balaji For R1 and R4 :Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate For R2 :Mr.B.Saravanan For R3 :Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan ***** 1/3

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned auction notification, dated 10.11.2021 issued by the second respondent and consequently, to direct the second respondent to give priority to the members of the petitioner association by allotting shops that are constructed at Multilevel Car Parking of Old Central Market, Madurai.

2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that subsequent to the filing of this Writ Petition, a fresh auction notification was issued, in which, members of the petitioner association have also participated. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the successful tenderers may be allotted with the shops by the second respondent. 3.The learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent, on instructions, would submit that successful bidders in the fresh notification called for by the second respondent will be allotted the shops at Multilevel Car Parking of Old Central Market, Madurai. If the members of the petitioner association are the successful bidders in respect of the shops, on instructions, he would submit that the second respondent Corporation undertakes to allot the shops to them. The said statement is recorded.

4.The learned Counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the statement made by the learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent.

5.After recording the submissions made by the respective Counsels, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms thereof. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cmr To 1.The Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu, Department of Tourism and Culture, Chepuak, Chennai.

2/3

2.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai - 625 002.

3.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple, Madurai.

4.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Anna Bus Stand, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-8293, SR-8362[F] dated 24/02/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.B.SARAVANAN, Advocate ( SR-8472[F] dated 24/02/2022 ) 23.02.2022 RD(08.03.2022) 3P 7C 3/3