← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18549/2021allowed

Chinnathurai v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2021-11-25Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18549 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18549 of 2021 1.Chinnathurai 2.Selva 3.Manikandan Karuppasamy 4.Jeyaprabhu 5.Nangamuthu ... Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 5 vs.

1.The State rep. by Sub Inspector of Police, Puliyampatti Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

(In Crime No.68 of 2021) ... 1st Respondent/ Complainant

2. Suresh ... 2nd Respondent/ defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to FIR in Crime No.68 of 2021 dated 19.09.2021 for the offences under Sections 147, 148,341, 294(b), 387 and 506(ii) of IPC on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Anto Prince For R1 : Mr.M.Sakthikumar Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.S.Karuppiah

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for quashing the FIR in Crime No.68 of 2021 registered on the file of the first respondent.

2. The defacto complainant Suresh is present in person before this Court. He has been duly identified by Thiru.A.Sivaraman SI of Police, Puliyampatti Police Station, Thoothukudi District. The defacto complainant categorically states before this Court that he https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18549 of 2021 does not want to pursue the complaint. Since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, no purpose will be served in keeping the impugned prosecution alive. The parties have also filed a joint compromise memo. The impugned FIR is quashed. The Criminal Original Petition is allowed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS III) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rmi Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Puliyampatti Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.G. ANTOPRINCE, Advocate ( SR-35960[F] dated 25/11/2021 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18549 of 2021 25.11.2021 MGJ(17.12.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2