Durai @ Duraipandi v. The State Of Tamilnadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 05/08/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI Durai @ Duraipandi, S/o.Pandi, .. Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District.
(Crime No.354 of 2025) .. Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner :Mr.C.Senthil Murugan Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.354 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/5
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 324(4) & 351(2) of BNS, 2023 @ U/s.324 (4), 351(2) of BNS r/w.3 of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.354 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, on 24.07.2025 at about 10.00.m., this petitioner and others said to have damaged the defactocomplainant's car bearing Registration No.TN 07 W 4848. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent police lodged a false case against this petitioner. This petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner is ready and willing to abide any conditions which may be imposed by this Hon'ble Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that due to previous enmity, this petitioner and others were said to have damaged the defacto-complainant's car. At the time of occurrence, no one sustained injury. There is no previous case against the petitioner. However, he opposed to grant 2/5
anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the date of occurrence was happened on 24.07.2025, FIR was registered on 27.07.2025, by this time most of the investigation might have been completed, there is no previous case against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Melur, and on further conditions that: (a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall make a non-refundable deposit of Rs.9,500/- (Rupees 3/5
Nine Thousand Five Hundred only) to the credit of Crime No.354 of 2025 without prejudice to his defence before the trial Court; and on such deposit being made, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner; the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur shall deposit the said amount as fixed deposit and the entitlement of the said amount will be decided at the time of disposal of the main case;
(c) the petitioner shall furnish his residential address and contact number to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur. In the event of any change in his residential address, the petitioner shall report the same to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur;
(d) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;
(e) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(f) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (g) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme 4/5
Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (h) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023.
sd/- 05/08/2025 / TRUE COPY / /2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
gvn TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Melur.
2. The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.C.SENTHIL MURUGAN, Advocate ( SR-8478[I] dated 06/08/2025 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.12914 of 2025 Date :05/08/2025 HPS/26.08.2025 5P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5