A. Samraj v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 A.Samraj ... Petitioner vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Cultural Endowments Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 0034.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Cultural Endowments Department, Nagercoil.
3.The Fit Person, Thottiyode Perumalmadam & Pillayar Koil, Office at Kannivinayarkoil, Vaideeswaram Village, Agastheeswaram Taluk, 4.The District Revenue Officer, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.
1/6
5.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanaburam, Kanyakumari District.
6.The Tahsildar, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.
7.Anirutheen Thambi 8.V.Vimala Devi Thankachy 9.A.Gopakumar 10.Raman Thambi 11.Kalapara Family Trust @ Kalapara Family Vaka Perumalmadam Trust, Represented by its Secretary, K.P.Kesavan Thampi, Siva Sree, MGRA -15, Anayara, Trivandrum 29.
12.M.Vincent 13.Clifford Nallathambi Rajakumar 14.S.Sridharan 15.Ruthrayini Pillai Thankachy 16.Sreethariar Sanga Mandal, Represented by its President Kay, S/o.Surendran, Villukkuri Village, Kalkulam Taluk, ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the orders passed in M4/13213/13 dated 02.12.2015 on the file of the fourth respondent, quash the same.
2/6
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader for R.1, R.2, R.4 to R.6 : Mr.K.Sathya Singh for R.3 : Mr.K.Sree Kumaran Nair for R.7 to R.10 : Mr.T.Cibi Chakraborthy for R.12 : Mr.T.Selvakumaran for R.14
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) When the case came up for hearing on 15.04.2024, since there was no representation for the petitioner, it was directed to be listed under the caption "For Dismissal".
3/6
2. Accordingly, it is listed under the caption "For Dismissal" and today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [R.S.K.,J.] [G.A.M.,J.] 22.04.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No ps 4/6
To 1.The Commissioner, Represented by the State of Tamil Nadu, Hindu Religious & Cultural Endowments Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 0034.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Cultural Endowments Department, Nagercoil.
3.The Fit Person, Thottiyode Perumalmadam & Pillayar Koil, Office at Kannivinayarkoil, Vaideeswaram Village, Agastheeswaram Taluk, 4.The District Revenue Officer, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.
5.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanaburam, Kanyakumari District.
6.The Tahsildar, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.
5/6
R.SURESH KUMAR ,J.
and G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.
ps ORDER MADE IN DATED : 22.04.2024 6/6